to the Tribunal of the Catholic Archdiocese of Seoul
 #1 Myeongdong 2-ga Seoul, 100-809 Korea
 
 
 Petitioners
 KIM Petrusand 2,995Petitioners(Annex E. F.)
 On behalf of. 2nd2,996 Petitioners
 SONG, Jung-sook Clara
 Room 1205 Samsung CheilBldg #702-2 Yeoksamdong Seoul 135-751
 tel 02-527-2929 fax 02-527-4455 e-mail; webmaster@aware.co.kr
 
 v.
 
 
 Defendants
 Rev. Augustinus HAM, Rev. Lucas AN, Rev. PetrusKIM(Taek-am),
 Rev. Eusebius YANG (of Seoul Archdiocese),
 Monsignor Philippus KIM, Rev. PetrusHWANG(of Inchon Diocese),
 Rev. Robertus AN, Rev. JoannesPARK(of Wonju Diocese),
 Rev. Joannes KWAK, Rev. Leo YEON(of Chiongju Diocese),
 Rev. Petrus SONG, Rev. NicomedesPARK(of Pusan Diocese),
 Rev. Aloysius KIM, Rev. Edward LEE(of Masan Diocese),
 Rev. Thomas Aquinas CHEONG,
 Monsigor Pius CHO(of Kwangju Archdiocese),
 Rev. Bartholomeus MUN, Rev. LaurentiusLEE(of Jeonju Diocese),
 Rev. Andreas BANG, Rev. Joannes AN, Rev. Albertus RYU,
 Rev. Andreas BAE(of Suwon Diocese),
 Rev. MoysesKWON(of Daegu Archdiocese),
 Rev. Simon LIM(of Cheju Diocese),
 Rev. Franciscus Xavier KIM(of Daejon Diocese)
 and certain priests who perpetratedanonymously.
 
 ) Offence 1. Contempt for Superior
  (CDIC can.273)
 
 ) Offence 2.Incitement to animosity and
 disobedience to Superior
  (CDIC can.1373)
 ) Offence 3. Denunciation of Superior
  (CDIC can.1390)
 
 Facts and Grounds of Petition
 
 1 Against Magisterium of His Eminence Nicholas Cardinal Cheong.
 On Dec 10, 2010. certain priests (members of so-called The Catholic Priests’ Association for Justice – This group is an illegal organization, within the Korean Catholic Church, which has persisted in violation of Codex IurisCanonici can.300. can.312) have mounted a challenge to His Eminence Nicholas Cardinal Cheong and called his righteous and just teaching(evidence 1.), with regard to the Restoration of Four Major Rivers(the Korean Public Works), a deceitful explanation(or sophistry).
 They have vilified and jeered at him, by way of questioning, “whether he had sided with the Korean government because of his hidden weakness or not.”
 They have insulted him by distortion and denunciation that he had stirred up hatred against North Korea.(Evidence 2. 3. 6. 7. 9. 10.)
 
 On Dec 13, 2010.they arranged a press interview, revolted against Superior, overturned the Church order and demanded an apology and resignation of His Eminence Cardinal Cheong.(Evidence 4. 5. 9. 10.)
 
 (violation of CDIC can.273. can.1373. can.1390.)
 
 2 We, the faithful, hereby sign our names on this petitionand refer the above offences, for relevant and just punishment,
 of Rev. Augustinus HAM, Rev. Lucas AN, Rev. Petrus KIM(Taek-am), Rev. Eusebius YANG (of Seoul Archdiocese), Monsignor Philippus KIM, Rev. Petrus HWANG(of Inchon Diocese), Rev. Robertus AN, Rev. Joannes PARK(of Wonju Diocese), Rev. Joannes KWAK, Rev. Leo YEON(of Chiongju Diocese), Rev. Petrus SONG, Rev. Nicomedes PARK(of Pusan Diocese), Rev. Aloysius KIM, Rev. Edward LEE(of Masan Diocese), Rev. Thomas Aquinas CHEONG, Monsigor Pius CHO(of Kwangju Archdiocese), Rev. Bartholomeus MUN, Rev. Laurentius LEE(of Jeonju Diocese), Rev. Andreas BANG, Rev. Joannes AN, Rev. Albertus RYU, Rev. Andreas BAE(of Suwon Diocese), Rev. Moyses KWON(of Daegu Archdiocese), Rev. Simon LIM(of Cheju Diocese), Rev. Franciscus Xavier KIM(of Daejon Diocese), who have conspired or consented to contempt for Superior, incitement to animosity and disobedience to Superior and calumnious denunciation of Superior.
 We also refer the offences, for ascertainment and punishment, of certain priests who have written such illegal public statements or consented to them, behind the name shield of so-called CPAJ.(Evidence 2.)
 
 (according to CDIC can.1333. can.1341. can.1347. can.1417. can.1476.)
 
 3 The offenders stand for erroneous causes and grounds:
 They allege that Cardinal Cheong has done wrong by his expressionand intention different from the statement of Catholic Bishops’ Conference of Korea.(Evidence 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.)
 The statement of CCK, dated Mar 12, 2010. alleged that “the Korean government had pushed and hurried up Public Works for Restoration of Four Major Rivers without citizens’ consensus and had outwitted and evaded the law and the procedure.”
 The statement quoted a part of “Article 48 of Charitas in Veritate of the theSupreme Pontiff Benedict XVI”;“The environment is God's gift to everyone, and in our use of it we have a responsibility towards the poor, towards future generations and towards humanity as a whole.”(Evidence 11.)
 It is doubtful that the subject matter of RFMR had been officially noticed in advance, formally introduced and discussed, on the agenda, at CCK of March 2010.
 And, in its contents, the statement has untrue main parts.
 The Public Works of RFMR are being implemented, with the background of Korean citizens’ popular support, according to the Korean Law and the appropriate legal procedure, to improve the environment(Evidence 23-31).
 The Courts of the Republic of Korea dismissed all the claims of people who had opposed and disagreed with RFMR, Mar 12, 2010. through Jan 18, 2010., and adjudicated the judgment for the Public Works, that the project itself and proceedings of RFMR of the Republic of Korea is lawful, that it is estimated to be favorable to the environment of water, sea, atmosphere, soil, ecology of nature, living and socio-economic system, helpful to control water, flood, drought, water resources, water quality and valley inundation, and that it could avoid physical harm to historical remains.
 The statement, quoting the above part of the Article 48, did not quoted the other part which one had better quote for mature discernment.
 There is another text of the same “Article 48,” as follows; “In nature, the believer recognizes the wonderful result of God's creative activity, which we may use responsibly to satisfy our legitimate needs, material or otherwise, while respecting the intrinsic balance of creation. If this vision is lost, we end up either considering nature an untouchable taboo or, on the contrary, abusing it. Neither attitude is consonant with the Christian vision of nature as the fruit of God's creation.”
 
 
 4 His Eminence Nicholas Cardinal Cheong, Archbishop and the Ordinary of Seoul Archdiocese, has settled the issue,
 by historically just and legitimate judgment out of pastoral care, and has given the Korean faithful the peace of conscience.
 His Eminence has clarified that “the faithful could support to or dissent from Public Works for Restoration of Four Major Rivers of the Republic of Korea, as long as abiding by the principle of protection of environment.”(Evidence 8. 9. 10. 12.)
 
 
 5 Most Rev. Peter KANG, president of CCK, shall not issue any statement, nor deliver any speech nor any act
 
 in the name of all the Bishops of Korea, against the teaching authority ofHis Eminence Nicholas Cardinal Cheong, Archbishop and the Ordinary of Seoul Archdiocese, with regard to this issue. (CDIC can.455.)
 
 The above statement of CCK against the Korean Public Works was the casewhich “neither the universal law nor a special mandate of the Apostolic See gives the Episcopal Conference the power” to actwith.
 The teachings of the faithful,during and after the above statement, by the President of CCK with regard to this issue have conflicted with the teachings by Magisterium of the respective Ordinarysincluding Archbishop and the Ordinary of Seoul Archdiocese (Annex A)(Evidence 10. 12. 18), constituted a transgression of CDIC can.455. section 4., and therefore are invalid.
 We, the faithful, do cordially request Most. Rev. Petrus KANG, the President of CCK, to revoke the erroneous act without delay.
 
 
 6 About Petitioners;
 
 On Dec 21, 2010. 7 days after the twice repeated perpetration, we(some of Annex B)did cordially requested some of reproof, and imposition of penalty, in case of no avail, on the perpetrators who are the priests, member of so-called CPAJ, by notice of newspaper advertisement in name of ‘14 faithful of same opinion’(evidenc 13.)
 
 After wait, we ‘the Catholic Faithful for Defence of Magisterium’(Annex B) have prepared 1st Petition and put up notice in newspaper advertisement on Jan 18, 2011.(Evidence 14.), requesting to sign the Petition and Power of Attorneyof the like-minded faithful. On this notice, the faithful who signed and sent them by mail, facsimile or e-mail(Annex C)(Evidence 15) numbered 2,106people and by internet sign(Annex D)(Evidence 16) numbered 1,286 people.
 (1st Petitionersof 3,408 people)
 
 We ‘the Catholic Faithful for Defence of Magisterium’ have prepared another 2nd Petition and put up notice in newspaper advertisement on Feb9, 2011.(Evidence 21. 22), requesting again to sign the Petition and Power of Attorney. On this notice, the faithful who signed and sent them by mail, facsimile or e-mail (Annex E)(Evidence 32) numbered 1,648 people and by internet sign (Annex F)(Evidence 33) numbered 1,348 people.
 (2nd Petitioners of 6,404people )
 
 7 Jurisdiction over Defendants and their addresses
 
 As the said Contempt for Superior,Incitement to animosity and disobedience to Superior, and Denunciation of Superior of Dec 10, and 13, 2010., were perpetrated in Seoul City, an area of Seoul Archdiocese, the Tribunal of the Catholic Archdiocese of Seoul has jurisdiction over Defendants.
 Since Defendants belong to the respective Dioceses or Archdioceses, Petitioners substitute the above mentioned Dioceses or Archdioceses for each Defendant’s address
 
 8 About anonymous priests of perpetration
 
 The priests, who perpetrated on Dec 13, 2010., signed their names on the statement and made public(evidence 4. 5.)
 Another priests have conspired anonymously to write the statement on Dec 10, 2010.(evidence 2. 3.), or consented to it. They are required to be traced and confirmed, for certain priests of the illegal organization as CPAJ have been usually leading activist movements anonymously with the name shield of the organization.
 
 Annex
 
 A Teachings of Bishop KANG.
 B Initiators of Petition(the Catholic Faithful to Defend Magisterium), 16 people.
 E Petitioners 1,648 people by mail, facsimile and e-mail.
 F Petitioners 1,348 people by internet sign
 G Power of Attorney
 
 Evidence
 
 1 Cardinal Cheong’s Interview on Dec 9, 2010.
 2 The statement by CPAJ on Dec 10, 2010.
 3 Report of ChosunIlbo(Daily Newspaper) on Dec 11, 2010.
 4 The statement by senior members of CPAJ on Dec 13, 2010.
 5 Report of Newsees on Dec 13, 2010.
 6 Editorial column of MunhwaIlbo on Dec 13, 2010.
 7 Report of Dong-aIlbo on Dec 14, 2010.
 8 Report of TheCatholictimeson Dec 19, 2010.
 9 Report(on 4 major rivers) of Weekly Chosun on Dec 24, 2010.
 10 Report(on CPAJ) ofWeekly Chosun on Dec 27, 2010.
 11 The statement by CCK on Mar 12, 2010.
 12 Report(drowned Catholic Church in 4 major rivers) of Monthly Chosun,Sept 2010.
 13 Advertisement(We request reproof and penalty) on ChosunIlbo, on Dec 21, 2010.
 14 Advertisement (Priests are liable to stand the Church tribunal) on ChosunIlbo, on Jan 18, 2011.
 15 671 Petitions by mail, facsimile and e-mail, Jan 18-28 2011.
 16 1286 Petitions by internet sign, Jan 18-28 2011.
 17. Unveiling of the priests by the expert on Dec 17, 2010.
 18 The Writing(by Bishop KANG) in Kyunghyang magazine, July 2010.
 19. Petition, on Jan 31, 2011.(in Korean)
 20. Petition, on Jan 31, 2011.(in English)
 21 Advertisement (Priests shall be sanctioned by the Church tribunal) on ChosunIlbo, on Feb 9, 2011.
 22. Advertisement (Priests shall be sanctioned by the Church tribunal) on Dong-aIlbo, on Feb 9, 2011.
 23. Decision of the Court on Mar 12, 2010.(on Han River)(the Republic of Korea has won)
 24. Official Report on Dec 3, 2010.(on Han River)( the Republic of Korea has won)
 25. Adjudication of the Court on Dec 3, 2010.(on Han River)( the Republic of Korea has won)
 26. Official Report on Dec 10, 2010.(on Rakdong River)( the Republic of Korea has won)
 27. Adjudication of the Court on Dec 10, 2010.(on Rakdong River)( the Republic of Korea has won)
 28. Official Report on Jan 12, 2011.(on Keumkang River)( the Republic of Korea has won)
 29. Adjudication of the Court on Jan 12, 2011.(on Keumkang River)( the Republic of Korea has won)
 30. Official Report on Jan 18, 2011.(on Yeongsan River)(the Republic of Korea has won)
 31. Court Report on Jan 18, 2011.(on Yeongsan River)(the Republic of Korea has won)
 32. 500 Petitions by mail, facsimile and e-mail, Jan 29-Feb 27, 2011.
 33 1,348 Petitions by internet sign, Jan 29-Feb 28, 2011
 
 March4, 2011
 
 Sincerely yours
 SONG, Jung-sook Clara
 On behalf of. 2nd2,996 Petitioners